
260+ Lectures, 65+ Hours of inDepth training on Mobile apps automation for IOS and Android using Appium on Real Devices
Appium - Mobile Testing with Latest 2.0 and Live Projects
InstructorRahul Arora
260+ Lectures, 65+ Hours of inDepth training on Mobile apps automation for IOS and Android using Appium on Real Devices
InstructorRahul Arora
Free
Free
Free


Editorial course preview
These 3 complementary views highlight concrete, legible examples from the course presentation.
This slide compares the features of five mobile testing frameworks—Robotium, Calabash, Appium, Selendroid, and iOS-Driver—highlighting platform support and file requirements.
This documentation page outlines the core philosophy of Appium, its compatibility with various programming languages, and the specific system requirements needed to set up the environment.
This screenshot displays the Selendroid project website, outlining its role as a test automation framework for native or hybrid Android apps and mobile web.
The curriculum includes modules on building large-scale frameworks using Page Object Models, TestNG, and Cucumber BDD integration.
Instruction covers automation for both Android and iOS, including execution on emulators, simulators, and real devices.
Multiple signals indicate that several lessons rely on deprecated APIs and older Appium versions. While the course has a recent update label, some negative reviews predating that date suggest the active learning path still contains legacy material that may require external research to resolve.
The sequence of modules can be confusing, as the curriculum mixes older and newer content without a clear progression. One signal from 2020 suggests this lack of organization persists, though the update label does not prove a correction has been made.
The curriculum aligns with the goals of manual testers and Selenium users, though technical debt may impact those seeking a seamless transition. This signal predates the displayed course update; the update may have addressed it, but the update label does not prove that it was corrected.